It is less well known, however, that Hasnas also argues that anarchy must be achieved gradually. But how can this work? In this paper, I show that directly confronting state power will never produce viable anarchy or minarchy. Using the example of Soviet jurist Evgeny Pashukanis, I detail an episode in apparent anti-statism which, by relying on the state, ended in disaster for the putative anti-statist. Suehiro also attempted to decrease state power by means of case law, but because he lacked a clear anti-statist teleology he ended up becoming an accomplice of state power, even imperialism. No reasonable anarchist advocates the total dissolution of government tomorrow.
|Published (Last):||7 March 2009|
|PDF File Size:||19.28 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.26 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Pashukanis family was of Lithuanian background; he was a cousin of the publisher, Vikentiy Pashukanis. In , he started studying jurisprudence in Saint Petersburg. As a result of his socialist activism, the Czarist police threatened Pashukanis with banishment, so he left Russia for Germany in He continued his studies in Munich.
During World War I , he returned to his native Russia. In August , he became a judge in Moscow. Meanwhile, he launched his career as a legal scholar. He also held a post in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and was an adviser to the Soviet embassy in Berlin , helping to draft the Rapallo Treaty of In he was transferred to full-time academic duties as a member of the Communist Academy.
This theory was built on two pillars of Marxist thought: 1 in the organization of society the economic factor is paramount; legal and moral principles and institutions therefore constitute a kind of superstructure reflecting the economic organization of society; and 2 in the finally achieved state of communism , law and the state will wither away. If communism is achieved, morality as it is typically understood will cease to perform any function.
Why does it assume the form of official state rule, or - which is the same thing — why does the machinery of state coercion not come into being as the private machinery of the ruling class; why does it detach itself from the ruling class and take on the form of an impersonal apparatus of public power, separate from society?
Latter years[ edit ] From to , Pyotr Stuchka , another Soviet legal scholar, and Pashukanis compiled an Encyclopedia of State and Law and started a journal named Revolution of Law. In , he was elected a full member of the Communist Academy, eventually becoming its vice-president. However, in , Nikolai Bukharin was attacked by Stalin, because he insisted that the state must wither away to bring forth communism, as Marx had advocated.
He was then stripped of all his political posts. Pashukanis soon came under pressure from the government as well. As a result, Pashukanis started to revise his theory of state. He stopped working with his friend Stuchka. Alfred Krishianovich Stalgevich, a longtime critic of Pashukanis, took over his courses at the Moscow Juridical Institute.
This small book, first published in , has now been translated into several Western and Eastern languages, but the English translation of the first edition appears for the first time below. When General Theory first appeared it is doubtful that anyone, least of an Pashukanis himself, could have foreseen its immediate success and the meteoric rise of its author within Marxist legal philosophy and the Soviet legal profession. Pashukanis was merely one of a dozen authors in the Soviet Union to publish on the Marxist theory of law and state during the years to In fact, he was one of the less well-known authors whose works appeared during this early flowering of Soviet legal philosophy. It was a crowded and distinguished field which included the Marxist philosopher Adoratsky; the pupil of Petrazhitsky, M. Few other authors in this period had their books reprinted, let alone issued in a new edition.
The General Theory of Law and Marxism